| ID | Technique | Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| T1543 | Create or Modify System Process | Persistence |
Detection: Windows Local LLM Framework Execution
Description
The following analytic detects execution of unauthorized local LLM frameworks (Ollama, LM Studio, GPT4All, Jan, llama.cpp, KoboldCPP, Oobabooga, NutStudio) and Python-based AI/ML libraries (HuggingFace Transformers, LangChain) on Windows endpoints by leveraging process creation events. It identifies cases where known LLM framework executables are launched or command-line arguments reference AI/ML libraries. This activity is significant as it may indicate shadow AI deployments, unauthorized model inference operations, or potential data exfiltration through local AI systems. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, intellectual property theft, or circumvention of organizational AI governance policies.
Search
1
2| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count
3 min(_time) as firstTime
4 max(_time) as lastTime
5from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
6where
7 (
8 Processes.process_name IN (
9 "gpt4all.exe",
10 "jan.exe",
11 "kobold.exe",
12 "koboldcpp.exe",
13 "llama-run.exe",
14 "llama.cpp.exe",
15 "lmstudio.exe",
16 "nutstudio.exe",
17 "ollama.exe",
18 "oobabooga.exe",
19 "text-generation-webui.exe"
20 )
21 OR
22 Processes.original_file_name IN (
23 "ollama.exe",
24 "lmstudio.exe",
25 "gpt4all.exe",
26 "jan.exe",
27 "llama-run.exe",
28 "koboldcpp.exe",
29 "nutstudio.exe"
30 )
31 OR
32 Processes.process IN (
33 "*\\gpt4all\\*",
34 "*\\jan\\*",
35 "*\\koboldcpp\\*",
36 "*\\llama.cpp\\*",
37 "*\\lmstudio\\*",
38 "*\\nutstudio\\*",
39 "*\\ollama\\*",
40 "*\\oobabooga\\*",
41 "*huggingface*",
42 "*langchain*",
43 "*llama-run*",
44 "*transformers*"
45 )
46 OR
47 Processes.parent_process_name IN (
48 "gpt4all.exe",
49 "jan.exe",
50 "kobold.exe",
51 "koboldcpp.exe",
52 "llama-run.exe",
53 "llama.cpp.exe",
54 "lmstudio.exe",
55 "nutstudio.exe",
56 "ollama.exe",
57 "oobabooga.exe",
58 "text-generation-webui.exe"
59 )
60 )
61by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name Processes.parent_process
62 Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
63 Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process
64 Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id
65 Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
66 Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
67
68| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
69
70| eval Framework=case(
71 match(process_name, "(?i)ollama") OR match(process, "(?i)ollama"), "Ollama",
72 match(process_name, "(?i)lmstudio") OR match(process, "(?i)lmstudio") OR match(process, "(?i)lm-studio"), "LM Studio",
73 match(process_name, "(?i)gpt4all") OR match(process, "(?i)gpt4all"), "GPT4All",
74 match(process_name, "(?i)kobold") OR match(process, "(?i)kobold"), "KoboldCPP",
75 match(process_name, "(?i)jan") OR match(process, "(?i)jan"), "Jan AI",
76 match(process_name, "(?i)nutstudio") OR match(process, "(?i)nutstudio"), "NutStudio",
77 match(process_name, "(?i)llama") OR match(process, "(?i)llama"), "llama.cpp",
78 match(process_name, "(?i)oobabooga") OR match(process, "(?i)oobabooga") OR match(process, "(?i)text-generation-webui"), "Oobabooga",
79 match(process, "(?i)transformers") OR match(process, "(?i)huggingface"), "HuggingFace/Transformers",
80 match(process, "(?i)langchain"), "LangChain",
81 1=1, "Other"
82)
83
84| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
85
86| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
87
88| table action dest Framework original_file_name parent_process parent_process_exec
89 parent_process_guid parent_process_id parent_process_name parent_process_path
90 process process_exec process_guid process_hash process_id process_integrity_level
91 process_name process_path user user_id vendor_product
92
93| `windows_local_llm_framework_execution_filter`
Data Source
| Name | Platform | Sourcetype | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2 | Other | 'crowdstrike:events:sensor' |
'crowdstrike' |
| Sysmon EventID 1 | 'XmlWinEventLog' |
'XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational' |
|
| Windows Event Log Security 4688 | 'XmlWinEventLog' |
'XmlWinEventLog:Security' |
Macros Used
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| security_content_ctime | convert timeformat="%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S" ctime($field$) |
| windows_local_llm_framework_execution_filter | search * |
windows_local_llm_framework_execution_filter is an empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
Annotations
Default Configuration
This detection is configured by default in Splunk Enterprise Security to run with the following settings:
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Disabled | true |
| Cron Schedule | 0 * * * * |
| Earliest Time | -70m@m |
| Latest Time | -10m@m |
| Schedule Window | auto |
| Creates Risk Event | False |
Implementation
The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the Processes node of the Endpoint
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
names and speed up the data modeling process.
Known False Positives
Legitimate development, data science, and AI/ML workflows where authorized developers, researchers, or engineers intentionally execute local LLM frameworks (Ollama, LM Studio, GPT4All, Jan, NutStudio) for model experimentation, fine-tuning, or prototyping. Python developers using HuggingFace Transformers or LangChain for legitimate AI/ML projects. Approved sandbox and lab environments where framework testing is authorized. Open-source contributors and hobbyists running frameworks for educational purposes. Third-party applications that bundle or invoke LLM frameworks as dependencies (e.g., IDE plugins, analytics tools, chatbot integrations). System administrators deploying frameworks as part of containerized services or orchestrated ML workloads. Process name keyword overlap with unrelated utilities (e.g., "llama-backup", "janimation"). Recommended tuning — baseline approved frameworks and users by role/department, exclude sanctioned dev/lab systems via the filter macro, correlate with user identity and peer group anomalies before escalating to incident response.
Associated Analytic Story
References
-
https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/artificial-intelligence/splunk-technology-add-on-for-ollama.html
-
https://blogs.cisco.com/security/detecting-exposed-llm-servers-shodan-case-study-on-ollama
-
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/sysmon
Detection Testing
| Test Type | Status | Dataset | Source | Sourcetype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Validation | ✅ Passing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Unit | ✅ Passing | Dataset | XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational |
XmlWinEventLog |
| Integration | ✅ Passing | Dataset | XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational |
XmlWinEventLog |
Replay any dataset to Splunk Enterprise by using our replay.py tool or the UI.
Alternatively you can replay a dataset into a Splunk Attack Range
Source: GitHub | Version: 1